Davy Corporate Finance is Ireland’s largest corporate finance adviser.
We work with domestic and international public, private, commercial and semi-state entities, combining innovative advice and proven execution skills, to provide a complete range of integrated corporate finance services.
Davy's Debt & Specialist Finance team is the largest in Ireland. We act for both borrowers and investors in the global debt markets.
We are active traders in all sovereign bonds and global credits, and are primary dealers of Irish government bonds.
Our Institutional Services are supported by innovative, timely and commercial ideas based on our knowledge and understanding of the companies we cover and the industries in which they operate.
For more than 85 years, Davy has been committed to serving charitable organisations.
Davy Charities offers comprehensive investment solutions across the Charity, Not-For-Profit, Endowment and Philanthropic investment landscape.
Davy has over 15 years' experience in the credit union market in Ireland, and can offer investment expertise and assistance in relation to regulatory and market developments.
Our dedicated Credit Unions team provides a choice of service offerings to meet the individual requirements of each Credit Union.
Davy offers a competitive share dealing service for Employee Share Option Plans (ESOP).
We have a highly qualified and experienced ESOP team dedicated to assisting members of company share plans. Services include Approved Profit Share Schemes, Employee Share Option Schemes, Restricted Stock Unit Schemes, and Save As You Earn Schemes.
The UK's historic vote to leave the European Union (EU) is the start, not the end, of the exit process. The political and economic impacts of this decision will play out over time, but here we attempt to lay out the initial steps towards an exit.
The first casualty of the referendum is Prime Minister, David Cameron, who has already announced that he will step down at the October Conservative Party Conference. This will open the path for a new leader to be elected who will then be charged with creating a framework for discussions with the EU. This framework will outline the two parallel negotiations regarding both the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the new trade agreement between the UK and EU.
The tone, and eventually terms, of the UK’s negotiations will need to reflect the majority view of Parliament rather than just a narrow view of the Leave campaign. The House of Commons as it currently stands has a majority of pro-Remain Members of Parliament (MPs) (454 MPs to 147) who will have a significant say in the eventual UK proposals. Previous statements by these MPs have indicated a preference to keep Britain inside the EU single market.
Staying inside the single market would mean Britain would have to keep its borders open to EU workers and continue to contribute to the EU budget. Prime Minister Cameron’s post-referendum statement made clear that the interests of all the UK, including Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, will need to be taken into account. Leave campaign leaders have already adopted a conciliatory stance, stating that they want a friendly relationship with the European Union but will struggle to reconcile their referendum platform with the British body politic.
The new government’s proposed framework will be debated and require the approval of Parliament. The process could continue through the rest of the year and we would expect significant debate before a consensus is reached. The 15th December European Council summit is a likely target date for the UK to formally invoke Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union (as amended by the Lisbon Treaty).
The best-case scenario would see the terms of withdrawal concluded within a two-year period. The timetable for an alternative trade agreement seems to present a greater challenge and could take significantly longer to complete. There is a scenario where the UK could exit without a free-trade agreement and be subject to much more unfavourable terms under the World Trade Organization (WTO). This is clearly the worst case and the least likely scenario.
We would expect, however, a preference to exit under a negotiated arrangement, most likely beyond the ‘most favoured nation’ status provided by the WTO. The more closely the arrangement is to accepting EU requirements on free movement of people and EU budget contributions, the more quickly an agreement could be reached. This would most likely require the UK to stay in the European Free Trade Area (EFTA), replicating the position of Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Given the polemic issue of migration, this could be too high of a hurdle to overcome. Negotiating a bespoke bilateral trade arrangement similar to Switzerland would seem the most likely option. However, this could drag on for years, and based on previous EU trade negotiations, could take the better part of a decade.